Rural credit, he recalled K.In Baru’s book, Dr Singh comes across as a polite, decent person, honest and thoughtful in his personal dealings, but a different animal in a public position. Raj telling him, is a ‘public good’ A loan waived by a bank may appear to be a private good since the primary beneficiary is the debtor."The second example is even more galling, as it concerns the economy, a sphere of Dr Singh’s specialisation. Baru, like others before him, talks of Dr Singh having responsibility without power; in hindsight a complementary problem was Dr Singh’s absence of a sense of responsibility for his actions — and refusal to take ownership of the outcomes of decisions of his government.Baru’s narrative reflects this. Whatever spin one may give to it, this will continue to be held against him. First, on page 84 Baru talks of Dr Singh’s attitude towards probity: "Dr Singh’s general attitude towards corruption in public life, which he adopted through his career in government, seemed to me to be that he would himself maintain the highest standards of probity in public life, but would not impose this on others.Paradoxical as it sounds, honest, humble men can sometimes be excruciatingly vain, though they wouldn’t recognise or admit to this themselves. Two examples would be explicatory. In The Accidental Prime Minister, Baru accepts the point, writes about Dr Singh’s mistakes and weaknesses but only just, and then proceeds to lay the blame — fairly — on Sonia Gandhi and the Congress establishment. It was the British, he explained, who first understood the nature of rural indebtedness and the importance of keeping the farmer alive. Baru has provided excellent material for helping do this.The equations referred to in the preceding paragraph are not unknown. When that base crumbled, and when — largely as a result of the policy paralysis and acts of commission and omission of the UPA government — the India economic story lost vigour, Dr Singh no longer had as many high-profile visitors. While his conscience was always clear with respect to his own conduct, he believed everyone had to deal with their own conscience. The fact that he was not allowed the autonomy of choosing even his finance minister, especially after that victory in 2009, has been commented upon and analysed to death.N. In this instance, he felt even less because he was not the political authority that had appointed them to these ministerial positions. He expected the Congress party leadership to deal with the black sheep in his government, just as he expected the allies to deal with their black sheep. As an economist, Dr Singh knew the loan waiver was wrong or least overdone. He spells out how Dr Singh’s political career began as a model — but ends as a warning. They have been speculated upon and written about ever since Dr Singh was nominated prime minister by Mrs Gandhi in May 2004. In other words, he was himself incorruptible, and also ensured that no one in his immediate family ever did anything wrong, but he did not feel answerable for the misdemeanours of his colleagues and subordinates. However, in keeping farmers alive, in sustaining the livelihood of farmers and in ensuring rural social stability, a loan waiver would have wider social benefits.com end-of.Ashok Malik can be contacted at malikashok@gmail. Intellectuals around the world wanted to meet him Many around the world had come to see him, as indeed many at home did, as a thinking man’s political leader. He is subservient almost to a fault, generally unwilling to take risks — the nuclear deal with the United States being the one exception — and uses (misuses ) his intelligence and learning to rationalise almost anything."Both the examples are telling of not so much Dr Singh’s clean conscience but his conscience’s uncanny ability to quickly come to terms with externally-induced expediency.However history may judge Manmohan Singh — and both the man himself and Sanjaya Baru, former media adviser to the prime minister and the author of this book, believe it will do so more generously than The accidental Prime Minister However history may judge Manmohan Singh — and both the man himself and Sanjaya Baru, former media adviser to the prime minister and the author of this book, believe it will do so more generously than contemporaries — it is fairly obvious that he has been a great disappointment, particularly in his second term. If there is one drawback, perhaps because Baru is too close to the events, too close to Dr Singh himself and too emotionally invested in the tragic hero of his book to take the truly long view, it is that Baru makes excuses for Dr Singh even when it needs to be bluntly stated that the emperor has no clothes.What makes Baru’s book a riveting and important read is that he provides an insider’s view, confirms some of what has hitherto only been guessed and gives us valuable, near real-time details that are rarely available in a country where recording recent history and memoirs of time spent in public office are not usual. Dr Singh seems to suffer from just such a predicament. Why did he choose not to This is what Baru writes:"One evening in late 2007, after sitting through a long inconclusive discussion on the subject of loan waivers with senior officials and ministers, Dr Singh walked back to his private working space He sat and gave me a long lecture on the history of loan waivers in India. As such, in all likelihood for more reasons than the author intended, this book tells us it is crucial to assess an individual not just for what he is but also for what he achieves, or doesn’t, in an institutional context. In practice, this meant that he turned a blind eye to the misdeeds of his ministers.Dr Singh’s academic credentials added lustre to the superstructure but did not constitute the base."Do such gushing paragraphs run away from an essential reality Without questioning Dr Singh’s academic degrees or capacity to summarise the global economic situation at a meeting of G20 heads of government, the fact is international policymakers and wonks and businessmen thronged his office in 2005 (or 2006 or 2007 for that matter) not because he was an intellectual giant but because the Indian economy was galloping. For example, in a chapter entitled "Manmohan’s Camelot", he talks of Dr Singh being praised by the Asean secretary-general in 2005 as "the world’s most highly qualified head of government": "Dr Singh’s academic and professional credentials had by now become legendary. In believing that his personal probity and Spartan habits, the self-evident benefits of some of the policies he was pushing — such as the nuclear deal — and his intellectual rigour would be universally acknowledged by the political class, Dr Singh showed both a certain naiveté and also flashes of egotism. He could have fought or tempered it. Many countries, including developed market economies, justified farm subsidies on such grounds. A debt waiver was a subsidy, and a public good. In a chapter entitled "Promises to Keep", Baru describes how Dr Singh wrestled with the idea of justifying the colossal, China All Stainless Steel Sealed Type CSK Head Blind Rivets Rs 72,000 crore farm loans’ write-off of 2008 that led to the fiscal deficit shooting up and came to exemplify a wasteful culture of government giveaways that eventually sunk the economy

When this happens, it’s easier to pass your stool. Not just that, it also helps in maintaining collagen and elastin, which help in forming your bone structure. A 28 gm serving, or about 7 walnuts, are good enough to give you about 2 gm of your daily intake. Make sure you also eat your fruits and China A2 FLAT HEAD INNER-HEX BODY CLOSE END BLIND RIVET NUTS Suppliers vegetables, and exercise to shed those extra kilos. DigestionWalnuts are really good for your gut. Walnuts are indeed one of the best nuts for brain health. (Photo: Representational/Pexels) We have often heard our parents say, "Walnuts are shaped like a brain, so they are good for your brain!" Turns out, they are absolutely right.2.What do walnuts contain?According to United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), a 28 gm serving of walnuts (about 7 nuts) contains the following nutrients:Protein: 4. Weight management Walnuts contain substantial amounts of fat and calories, but are actually helpful in weight management.5. Plus, magnesium and manganese are also good for improving your bone quality. This wonder nut comes with some amazing health benefits. They help you feel fuller, and help in curbing hunger. But that’s not it.26 gmEnergy: 183 kcalTotal dietary fibre: 1. They actually contain the highest amount of antioxidants, when it comes to all the nuts, like almonds and pistachios. It also lowers your risk of constipation and piles, because fibre helps in softening your stool.Time to grab a handful of walnuts! If you hate eating raw walnuts, just add them to your regular dishes. Walnuts are known for lowering cholesterol, so it’s a good idea to add them to your diet.3. Here are a few health benefits of walnuts:1. Also, they may possibly reduce inflammation, according to Enright. And walnuts contain a lot of antioxidants.26 gmIn addition to copper, walnuts come with a plethora other minerals, namely, manganese, zinc, phosphorous, magnesium and iron. Bone healthWalnuts are exceptionally rich in copper, which is known to improve bone density.Why should you eat walnuts?The US Dietary Guidelines suggest consuming about 25 to 30 gm of fibre every day.A handful of walnuts every day keeps the doctor away! Walnuts keep heart diseases at bay and are also good for your bones. They give a nice, crunchy texture to your yogurt, and can instantly add a kick to desserts. Heart healthAccording to Mandy Enright, a fitness instructor, walnuts are particularly good for your heart because they contain omega-3 fats, the good kind of fats. They are rich in fibres, and so help in bowel movements. Plus, fibre-rich diets reduce your risk of colon cancer, according to a study that has been published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.73 gmTotal fat: 18.9 gmTotal sugar: 0. ImmunityA good immune system is important for fighting off diseases.